Apple is dealing with a significant antitrust case related to the App Store, which determines whether or not the App Retailer capabilities as a monopoly, and now the corporate has that launched a website in protection of its practices – in an effort to show that the App Retailer is just not a monopoly.
In accordance with the web site, Apple has paid out $ 120 billion to builders within the App Retailer since its launch. The corporate additionally says that round 60 p.c of the 100,000 apps and app updates which are reviewed each week have been accredited. The primary motive why an app wouldn’t be accredited? It’s normally associated to minor bugs, the place privateness is a secondary motive.
Maybe extra fascinating than the statistics is the part about how Apple thinks it encourages competitors. Apple's argument is that though Apple is creating its personal apps, corresponding to Maps, Calendar and iCloud, it nonetheless permits competing providers, corresponding to Google Drive and Google Maps, within the App Retailer.
After all, that sort of factor misses the purpose a bit – the claimants within the case declare that Apple's practices are monopolistic as a result of the App Retailer is the one place the place you will get apps for the iPhone, however Apple nonetheless prices a excessive price to builders, it can’t attain Apple system homeowners with out paying for it. The argument has nothing to do with permitting competing apps within the App Retailer.
Nonetheless, Apple appears to counsel that builders produce other choices. For instance, builders can construct internet apps which are accessible by Safari and different internet browsers.
The web site additionally discusses the various kinds of apps which are accessible within the App Retailer. These embrace free apps, apps with ads, apps with in-app purchases and straight paid apps. A last class is the & # 39; Reader & # 39; class, which makes use of apps that enable customers to entry content material from providers corresponding to Netflix and Spotify, however this doesn’t enable customers to handle their subscriptions straight within the app. The benefit for builders right here is that whereas Apple makes 30 p.c fewer in-app purchases, together with subscriptions, customers can bypass their subscription on the web or one other system. The issue with that argument, nevertheless, is that builders should not allowed to supply helpful hyperlinks on the web in order that customers can handle their subscriptions.
You may view the website here yourself.